1. What is meant by a poor image? It seems to mean something that is of poor quality much like something that is copied or something that isn’t clear.
2. What is meant by the contemporary hierarchy of images? I think it’s meant to be more of a timetable of how poor images became images of better quality.
3. What qualifies a work as experimental? Things that I see that qualifies work as experimental is when a work is trying to work but it’s not and if it’s not finished as in it’s trying to get to a point where it should be different then what it is now.
4. Do you agree that poor images are poor because they are not assigned any vale from the clas society of images? Not really, I think it depends on who looking at the image, such as a image that I may look at could be poor in my eyes while another person may think otherwise.
5. What relevance does this have to painting? I see it as the same because paintings are also images and it depends on how it’s created or made whether it’s a poor image or not.
6. How do we measure the quality of image? I think we tend to measure the quality of the image on how it looks and how clear and deep the message is in that image.
7. Do you consider these qualities when constructing work? Most of the time, but not all.
8. What role does the human condition or the "everyday" have in your work? For my work human condition and things and ideas that are “everyday” have a huge role in my work, in fact it’s what I mostly use since my work tends to be somewhat about stereotypes.
1. What are your political concerns? Is there anything happening in the world beyond your self, that still effects you directly? Does this come into your work?
I don’t really have any political concerns at the moment and I don’t really use politics in my work.
2. What insights should artists provide? Do you agree that poets(artists) are "uniquely suited" to "speak publicly and morally about human aspirations"? To be honest I’m not sure what insights artist should provide but I’d don’t think I’d mind seeing more poets/artist speak publicly and morally about human aspirations.
3. Are any artists that you know or are currently looking at, critiquing our cultural or political systems through their work? Please elaborate on why you think these people are able or aren't able to make these works… At the moment the artists that I’m looking at aren’t that political.
4. What does it mean to be politically active? For me, it is to take physical action in some thing that is political.
5. Are you able to relate to the work that I've made this year? What work? Do you relate it to any other artists or movements? In all honesty I don’t think that I am able to relate to any of the work you’ve made this year.
6. What do you think would make my work better? At this time I don’t think I could answer that question, I would have to take a better look at your work.
7. Do you think some of my work can be political, even if I don't say it is, or take a specific position? Is this an effective way of discussing work? In some aspects yes, and I thing that it’s an informative and effective way to discuss work.
No comments:
Post a Comment